Life and Critical Illness Insurance | Life and Critical Illness Insurance Information

TAG | Critical Illness Insurance

Declined critical illness claim rates had been falling significantly down the years. One of the reasons may be that people’s awareness has increased concerning certain diseases. Having a visit to the doctor, for example, has become more frequent than before. Better dieting and exercise can be another reason. As a matter of fact, visiting the doctor regularly may have led to nearly any critical illness being discovered prematurely before it becomes lethal. Standard Life, one of UK’s most famous insurance companies had revealed its critical illness claim statistics for the entire year of 2006. Let’s have a look.

Standard Life affirmed that it had paid a total of 360 critical illness claims accounting for around GBP 18.7 million. Furthermore, a decrease in critical illness claim declination rate may have reached around 7.5 percent. Such figures may be encouraging especially to people who have yet to buy a critical illness cover. Also, the average claim value that Standard Life recorded may been around GBP 52,138. Then, the largest amount of critical illness they paid could be approximately GBP 500,000.

Furthermore, around 64 percent of claimants could be aged between 40 and 59 while about 33 percent could be under the age of 39. These figures might be of concern as we may still find quite a large amount of people suffering from critical illness. Additionally, 3 percent of claims could have been made by people over the age of 60. Further figures show that at the time people claimed for their critical illnesses, around 72 percent policies may have been in force since 4 years or more. Finally, 53 percent of critical illness claimants may have been women while the remaining 47 percent could have been men.

In addition to, figures concerning the leading causes for critical illness claims had also been released. As usual, cancer topped the list with around 60 percent of claims followed by heart attack with about 11 percent of critical illness claims. Also, multiple sclerosis recorded 8 percent of claims, stroke 4 percent, benign brain tumour 4 percent and finally other critical illness accounted for around 14 percent of claims. The declination of critical illness claims exist every year. But during the year 2006, the rate of claims turned down had fallen.

Statistics registered figures of only around 7.5 percent of claims rejected during the year 2006. Out of this, about 3.3 percent of claims had been declined as policy definitions were not met. The remaining 4.2 percent could have been declined due to non disclosure. If compared to the year 2005, 18 percent of critical illness claims may have been rejected at that time. 10 percent could have been turned down as policy definitions were not met and 8 percent due to non disclosure. These two causes remain common for many critical illness claims to be rejected.

As seen, there had been a considerable fall in critical illness declination cases of around 10.5 percent in only one year, that is, from 2005 to 2006. Looking at this, one may be encouraged to buy a critical illness. However, to be able to get the best results out of critical illness insurance may mean that a fair amount of shopping and comparison of quotes has to be done.

, , ,

Critical illness insurance was brought into the UK during the mid 1980’s. Since then, there have been considerable changes in the insurance market. More and more companies offering critical illness cover started to make their presence felt in the insurance market. Hence, competition was created and as a result, critical illness cover prices started to fall. However, policy price may depend on the amount of cover you may want or the type of critical illness policy you had chosen. So, let’s have a look at one of UK’s most popular insurance companies, Legal and General.

According to Legal & General, they had paid around GBP 92,100,000 in critical illness claims. More precisely, since the year 1996, GBP 394,000,000 may have been paid as claims. They said that they also believe that their range of products may be one among the best in the market. Furthermore, Legal & General has now started to cover 35 critical illness conditions, around 12 more than that set by the Association of British Insurers. By looking at this, people may be attracted towards buying a critical illness cover with Legal & General. Generally, people may have the tendency to look for a company which can offer cost effective benefits.

Furthermore, like any other insurance company, Legal & General may payout a tax free lump sum upon diagnosis of one of the 35 critical illnesses during the term of the policy. This one off payment may ease you out of certain financial difficulties by repaying your mortgage for example. Other advantages may follow, that is paying for private medical care, a convalescence holiday, making adaptations to a home or even maintaining individual or family lifestyles.

Legal & General may classify its critical illness plan in two different categories: Mortgage protection and Family protection. Mortgage Protection related critical illness plans had been much popular than critical illness standalone policies. Here are some mortgage protection policies combined with critical illness insurance. Mortgage term assurance + critical illness cover, Mortgage Decreasing Term Assurance + Critical Illness Cover, Mortgage Critical Illness Cover and Mortgage Decreasing Critical Illness Cover. As for the family protection plan, here are some examples of certain policies. Level Term Assurance + Critical Illness Cover, Critical illness cover, Family and Personal Income Plan (FPIP) Term assurance + critical illness cover (monthly benefits) and Family and Personal Income Plan Critical Illness Cover

Additionally, with some policies, critical illness cover for future or existing children might be automatically included. This money could be used to provide healthcare assistance to the ill child whilst healthy children could be given necessary childcare support if needed.

As seen above, Legal & General may be offering you numerous advantages when you buy a critical illness cover or any other type of insurance policy. But there are thousands of insurance companies in the UK from which you can choose from. They might be more cost effective. However, to get the best critical illness cover may depend on how you see the product. Low priced tagged critical illness policies might be attractive but you might end up getting a policy that may not be able to respond to your needs in the future.

, , ,

The survival period can be very important in a critical illness policy. So let’s have a look at the survival period in detail. To obtain payment from additional critical illness cover, it may be wise to make an agreement about a survival period. The survival period can be described as the time after which a critical illness occurs when the insurer cannot award the payout. Therefore, if the insured person passes away during this time, critical illness insurance may not award a payout.

Furthermore, many people who suffer from a critical illness, for example myocardial infarction, may hardly live throughout the survival period. Thus the premiums to pay every month may depend upon the length of the survival period picked. Also, the survival period may be required so that a good assessment about the critical illness claim made could be carried out. But this may become practically impossible to do after the death of the insured. At this moment, an autopsy may be needed but in most of the cases relatives may not agree with the idea.

The survival period may usually vary from fifteen to thirty days after the occurrence of a critical illness. But the survival period may also differ according to certain illnesses. Sometimes, the survival period may even be ruled out if the critical illness had been due to an accident. However, the survival period of a critical illness cover may demonstrate that it may in fact be a living benefit. On the other hand, if surgeries arise due to critical illness the insureds may have to bear the cost themselves. In this connection, the survival period may not play any role as the patient might either live or die during this time. As a matter of fact, a major medical expense may be required in this case. This may then be joined to the critical illness cover therefore making the MME pay for the medical expenses while the critical illness insurance could pay for other factors.

In addition, benefits may not be awarded if the critical illness claim had not been reviewed properly. This is called the assessment period. A neurological disorder of around 3 months must be confirmed for a critical illness such as stroke, as per the definitions. Thus, such a claim could be acceptable only after three months have passed. Otherwise, if a permanent neurological deficit occurs before three months, critical illness insurance might then make a payout if the survival period has been crossed. Each critical illness may have its own assessment period. This can be found in the definitions of the critical illnesses.

Moreover, a critical illness cover may also contain exclusions. Here are some common exclusions found on most critical illness covers.

- Attempt to suicide or self inflicted injury

- Drug and alcohol addict

- HIV/AIDS

Most policies may stipulate the fact that a payment may not be made if the critical illness claimed for might result from those mentioned above. However, if certain critical illness conditions of accidental character such as TPD, loss of limbs, etc. are included in the policy, the list of exclusions may be further extended to:

- Aviation

- Hazardous sports and pastimes

- Civil war and commotion

If you are going to be a new buyer of a critical illness policy, you may take care to pay as much attention as you can to the different options you insurers might be offering you. Knowing your critical illness policy might definitely help you in the future.

, , ,

For some time, there may have been some analysis regarding claims on critical illness products. Figures may not be as accurate so that a sound study could be made about the rate at which people made critical illness claims. However, results were managed to be shown. The critical illness risk over a general population quantity was derived. Therefore this result was compared with the expected results which could have shown more or less the critical illness incidence rate statistics.

Furthermore, population statistics relevant to the rate at which critical illness occurred may be taken as a starting point. Such statistics could be divided into age and sex and also age groups. The critical illness definition concerning the statistics must also be met by that of the policy. Also, many people suffer from the same critical illness twice in their lifetime, for example myocardial infarction. Critical illness insurance may provide cover only once after the start of the policy and then ceases. Additionally, people who have already suffered from this critical illness once may be denied to take a critical illness cover due to medical risk assessment. As a matter of fact, critical illness insurance might only consider the first myocardial infarction of a person. This may also apply to any other disease.

It can be hard to assume the extent of the effects of medical selection, antiselection and moral hazard as far as people are insured under critical illness cover. For standalone benefits, the chances of dying during the survival period may still remain. But this has to be ruled out as the critical illness benefits have to be paid out to those who may still be alive. Another factor which may appear can be that of smokers and non smokers related to critical illness insurance. The rate at which certain critical illness conditions occur may be due to the smoking habit of the insured. Around 90 percent of all lung cancers may be related to smoking. Also, the occurrence of a critical illness such as heart attack or stroke may be twice as high for smokers than non smokers. But these figures may vary according to the age for both men and women.

In many markets, tables may have been drawn representing the rates for both smokers and non smokers. By doing this, insurers could therefore have an idea about how smoking may eventually affect the incidence rates. This may also be vital to certain insurers who provide critical illness cover on the basis of aggregate premium rates. The aggregate rates may rely on the number of smokers insured. Thus the risk of antiselection could be bigger as people taking out the critical illness cover may be prone to certain illnesses prior to taking the cover.

Critical illness cover is a complex form of product. Its integration in the market may have been difficult and time consuming. Its adoption by people may have also been a gradual task as well, especially in the UK and the US market. South Africans may not have encountered this problem as critical illness insurance had been derived from there. Nowadays, critical illness insurance may have been well spread worldwide and may still be on continuity.

, , ,

Buying a critical illness cover may provide you benefits in the future. In this case, you have to pay monthly or yearly premiums so that the critical illness policy remains in force. Premium payments may fluctuate as per the type of insurance, your age, your health conditions, whether you are a smoker, etc. Premium payments may also vary if you take a critical illness policy related to mortgage, for example. Here the premium values may rise.

Thus, you may find yourself in a difficult situation should your critical illness claim be turned down after many years of contribution. So, let’s have a look at some critical illness claims made and their outcomes in the UK during the past years.

As per Standard Life 2005, an amount of approximately GBP19.8 million may have been paid on about 342 critical illness claims. Specifically, a sum of around GBP58, 000 may have been disbursed per claim. Furthermore, during the year 2005, around 82 percent of critical illness claims may have been awarded in contrast to nearly 80 percent of the previous year. Moreover, 18 percent of claims may have been declined. Not meeting policy definitions may have accounted for around 10 percent of critical illness claims being turned down. On the other hand non disclosure may have brought around 8 percent of declined cases.

Additionally, prior to taking out a critical illness cover everything about present health status and your medical past should be disclosed to your insurers. Besides, if any kind of hereditary disease exists in your family you should make your critical illness insurers aware about the fact. You could therefore be made to undergo some medical tests in order to verify if you could qualify for a critical illness cover or not. This may depend on the results that will appear after the medical test. Should you be awarded critical illness cover, the premium payments rates could rise.

Moreover, further reports may show that approximately 63 percent of people aged 40-49 and about 32 percent of people aged 0-39 may have been more likely to make the critical illness claims. Additionally, cancer may have brought around 52 percent of critical illness claims while 13 percent may have been for heart attack. Around two thirds of people who made the claims may have been in possession of their policies for four years.

Skandia, one of the leaders in the critical illness market has pulled the curtain on its report about critical illness claims as from February 2007. They affirm having paid around 1920 claims summing up to an amount of around GBP182 million. They also revealed that the average age of claimants may have been more likely to be 46. However, the most common critical illness claims may have been cancer, around 58 percent, heart attack, around 15 percent, heart surgery around 8 percent and stroke around 7 percent. More statistics show that the most common forms of cancer more likely claimed for may have been: breast cancer, around GBP23million, lower intestine nearly GBP11 million, malignant melanoma about GBP9 million and prostate approximately GBP7 million. In addition to, they may have paid around 88 percent of claims while the remaining 12 percent could have been rejected as they did not match policy criteria or non disclosure.

Disclosure of your medical history to you critical illness insurers might be of help for you especially at the moment of payout. Anyone would be happy to know that his critical illness claim had been accepted. Fortunately cases of non disclosure and not meeting policy definitions may be decreasing. The reason could be that people may be becoming more aware and careful when choosing a critical illness cover. So let’s hope for this trend to continue.

, , ,

Critical illness insurance is not just a measure of precaution for the future. It can also be considered as a means to save you money. The idea of having a critical illness insurance is fine. But it can be rather tricky when choosing a critical illness policy. You could even end up having different quotes and contracts in hand that it becomes a headache to unlock your best deal. There are a lot of companies which offer many different versions of critical illness insurance.

Most people choose a critical illness insurance because they are worried about the well being of their family. Such cases reveal that many of these people are the sole revenue maker at home. Therefore if the income happens to be lost by one way or the other but in rule with the critical illness policy, a lump sum can ease financial crisis. There are no rules of how to use the lump sum. The way you use the money is completely up to you. You could use it to pay your mortgage or otherwise cover any debts. That way, if you are in a critical state, you are freed from many expenses. In other words, a critical illness insurance can be your support.

In case you are diagnosed with a range of disease, you will receive benefits from your critical illness insurance. The range of diseases covered is at least 30, but now tends to increase as policies differ from one company to the other. Critical illness insurance covers seven major diseases. All conditions are not covered. The most common exclusions are: drug abuse, HIV/AIDS, etc. New rules have been set by the Association of British insurers that have more strictness towards the payment of lump sum. For example there must be full evidence of heart attack, which is chest pain, before the critical illness insurance pays out.

To take a critical illness cover, you will be required to fill a form. Your insurer will ask you if members of your family have followed treatment of any kind. If you have a positive answer, the procedure may become lengthy. The critical illness insurance may insist that you undergo a medical test before they finalise the policy. In this course, the critical illness insurance may decide to give you limited cover or make you pay higher premiums.

Premium payments towards a critical illness insurance have tended to rise. This is due to the progress made in the medical industry. Using this factor, critical illness insurance companies have started to revise their rules hence redefining what falls out to be critical illness or not. Nearly all critical illness insurances allow you to take cover if you fall between the ages of 18 to 70 years old. You can normally take a cover as long as you want. You can easily judge it on how much mortgage you have to pay, for example. Remember that almost any critical illness insurance will require you to wait for a period of three months before paying out.

Therefore, as seen, choosing the best critical illness insurance is not always an easy task. You may be attracted by cheap policies. Cheap policies often provide a limited cover. There are also policies that cover a lot of diseases. But is that a form of camouflage that just calls you and suddenly engulfs you with high rates of premiums? So be careful when you buy a critical illness insurance.

For more information feel free to visit http://www.unbeatablelifeandcriticalinsurance.co.uk.

, , , ,

Since its appearance in South Africa during the year 1984, critical illness insurance had evolved considerably. Critical illness insurance may more likely play an important role in the insurance market nowadays. The number of critical illness conditions covered had gradually increased down the years. People can now benefit from a critical illness insurance policy that is more effective than that of years ago. Let’s have a look at how critical illnesses evolved in a decade, that is from the year 1984 to the year 1994.

According to Munich Re, 2001, in the year 1984, 53 percent of people may have suffered from a critical illness like heart attack followed by 8 percent for coronary artery bypass. Additionally, around 10 percent of people may have also suffered from a critical illness such as renal failure or stroke while 29 percent may have contracted a critical illness like cancer. In the year 1994, a relative decrease in heart attack patients may have been recorded. Around 39 percent of people may have contracted heart attack whilst 9 percent may have suffered from coronary artery bypass. An additional 5 percent may have been patients of renal failure and stroke followed by 12 percent for other critical illness conditions and finally 37 percent may have been victims of a critical illness like cancer. In these ten years, the rate of heart attacks had decreased while the rate of cancer had increased.

Moreover, the claim experience among people of different ages had also been researched by the Continuous Statistical Committee: Dread Disease Investigation 1991-1994. The results that would be demonstrated had been taken between the years 1991 to 1994. Around 19 claims had been made by men aged 20-24, 50 aged 25-29 and 92 aged 30-34. More critical illness claims may have been more likely made by men. About 151 critical illness claims could have been made by men aged 35-39, 207 aged 40-44, 168 aged 45-49, 129 aged 50-54 and finally 54 aged 55-59.

On the other hand, the critical illness claims concerning women had also been recorded. Around 9 claims may have been made by women aged 20-24, 28 aged 25-29, 37 aged 30-34 and 51 aged 35-39. So far, if compared to men, women might have made less critical illness claims. The claimed values continue as follows. Approximately 57 critical illness claims could have been made by women aged 40-44 followed by 39 aged 45-49, 19 aged 50-54 and finally 9 aged 55-59. If the results are looked at carefully, one could notice that the critical illness claims have been decreasing down the years.

Only three companies may have participated in the research carried out as seen above. Their total number of critical illness claims may have been around 880 from 1991 to 1994. It was therefore difficult to analyse the critical illness claims by cause or even smoker status. The actual critical illness claims for men may be around 70 percent in the first policy year compared to the claim ratio of policies older than a year. The same thing may also apply for women.

Critical illness insurance may have taken the right place in someone’s life nowadays. As the risks of contracting a critical illness may be increasing, a future protection plan is sought. As a fact, many people worldwide may have chosen critical illness insurance to consolidate their plannings.

, , ,

Critical illness insurance may have been designed long ago as a means to cope with the lack of health care systems in some countries. Since then, the development of critical illness cover has been considerable. More and more people may be seeking for critical illness cover as the product may have become widely known across the UK and worldwide. Insurance companies may nowadays provide cover for up to 30 critical illness conditions while others may restrict themselves to only seven. Competition over the insurance market may have pushed insurers towards the addition of many critical illnesses in certain policies. However the occurrence of critical illness still prevails.

Here are some facts and statistics about some critical illnesses during the past few years.

Cancer

As per to the Breast Cancer Campaign 2002, it can be said that 1 of every 9 women may contract a critical illness such as breast cancer. Furthermore, in the year 1997, around 38,000 women may have been diagnosed with this life threatening critical illness. Further analysis of the current situation may suggest that this rate could increase every passing year. Fortunately, improving medical techniques and treatments may have made it possible for around 60 percent of women to stay alive 5 years after an intervention for this critical illness.

The Office of National Statistics stated that in the year 2000, about 150,000 people may have passed away due to cancer. More precisely speaking, every 3 and a half minutes one person may die. This may then make of cancer one of the most lethal critical illness in the UK. Also, in the year 2000, the death of around 20,600 men and 13,000 women may have been caused by lung cancer than any other form of cancer.

Deafness

According to RNID 2002, a total amount of around 8 million people may be deaf or hard of hearing. This result may show a critical illness in ascent. Out of these, approximately 673,000 people may be severely or profoundly deaf relying on lip-reading and requiring a text phone or video phone to communicate.

Kidney failure

As per the UK Renal Registry 1998, at the end of the year 1998, around 31,000 people may have been more likely to suffer from a critical illness such as end-stage renal failure. As a result, about half of the patients could have been treated by transplant surgery while the remaining may have been treated with dialysis.

Multiple Sclerosis

According to Multiple Sclerosis Society, 2002, this critical illness may have made around 85,000 patients in the UK. Furthermore, figures may show that each year about 2,500 new cases of multiple sclerosis are diagnosed. Additionally, it may be a saddening fact to find out that multiple sclerosis may be the most common neurological disorder among young adults. This critical illness may prevail among people usually aged between 20 to 40.

The rates at which these critical illnesses occur may be of much concern. You could imagine the possible financial catastrophe people could undergo should critical illness cover not exist. Thanks to critical illness cover payout, some income may be injected so that the person’s family may continue their usual trend of life.

, , ,

Critical illness insurance had been designed to provide a tax free lump sum to the insured in the event of a critical illness. However, the critical illness should be appropriately met by the insurance’s policy definitions. Many critical illness policies contain seven critical illness conditions pointed out as: Cancer, heart attack, stroke, kidney failure, multiple sclerosis, coronary artery bypass and major organ transplant. Gradually insurance companies have increased the number of illnesses they cover. Nowadays, many critical illness policies may offer cover to around 30 critical illnesses. Therefore, this may have led to many critical illness policy sales during the past few years.

Furthermore, among the likes of cancer and heart attack, stroke may be considered the third factor for most critical illness claims in the UK. Let’s have a look.

Moreover, as per the Stroke Association 2002, approximately 10 percent of stroke suffering victims may be of the retirement age. Also, around 33.3 percent of people suffering from this critical illness may end up being disabled. Disability can change someone’s life. Had it not been for critical illness insurance, changing needs according to a different lifestyle may not have been a possibility. For example, buying a car conceived for disabled persons, accommodating the house for a wheelchair and even starting up new training for a different work. Further reports may show that around 33 percent of people may also die due to this critical illness after 1 year of diagnosis and attempt of treatment. Others may still make a good recovery.

Additionally, according to the Office for National Statistics 2005, during the year 2004, about 0.8 percent of men suffering from a critical illness such as stroke may have been recorded. The critical illness may have also affected other age groups of people. This can be demonstrated as follows: 0.1 percent of men aged 16-44, 0.8 percent aged between 45-64, 1.1 percent aged between 65-74 and 5.4 percent aged 75 or more all suffered from a critical illness like stroke. As for women, the results may have been somewhat different. In the year 2004, 0.6 percent of women may have been victims of stroke. In addition to, statistics showed that this critical illness may have also affected 0.7 percent of women of all ages, 0.2 percent aged between 16-44, 1.5 percent aged between 65-74 and 1.9 percent aged 75 or more.

According to the Stroke Association 1999, around 100,000 people may suffer from stroke each year in the UK. Thanks to the improvements made in the medical field, about 70 percent of patients may be more likely to survive this critical illness for one year. Stroke can be a dangerous critical illness as disability may often succeed after treatment. Researches may show that stroke can be largest responsible cause for disability in the UK, solely making 300,000 victims at any one time.

Looking at all the statistics, one may at once point out that the rate of incidence of stroke may be alarming. If looked at the figures closely one may also find out that a critical illness such as stroke may affect most men that women. One possible explanation may be that men may not have enough time to have a proper exercise and also visit the doctor for a health check up. Thus, the critical illness may as a matter of fact prove to be more lethal to men than women. As a solution, critical illness cover may be taken out to reduce the risks of a financial avalanche as well as secure a certain medical treatment cost in case stroke should occur in the future.

, , ,

The South African market had not taken much time to adopt critical illness cover. The success of critical illness cover in the South African market may have been one worth considering. Should it not have been this way, critical illness cover might not have reached worldwide destinations as successfully as we see nowadays. However, Munich Re 2000 affirms that accelerated critical illness policies may be enduring a downfall recently. Let’s see.

According to Munich Re 2000, around 60 percent of life policies may have been accelerated with critical illness cover during the late 1980’s. Recent reports carried out may show the fact that this value may have eventually decreased to 25 percent. There may be a reason that could explain this fact. Major medical expenses may be taken in South Africa to provide additional benefits to cope with medical expenses. As a matter of fact, the MME may have been able to close the gap due to the lack of facilities resulting from the healthcare system much better than critical illness cover. Moreover, the MME may be much cheaper than critical illness cover. Also, it may cover much more conditions than critical illness cover. Another advantage with MME is that it may be offered as a family protection plan. Thus, looking at these factors, people may be eventually losing interest in critical illness cover.

Furthermore, some problems may have been encountered by insurers after the implementation of critical illness cover in the South African market. One problem could be that critical illness claims may have risen suddenly soon after the start of newly taken policies. The majority of claims at that time may have been concerning multiple sclerosis and cancer. Thus, it may be assumed that people may have self diagnosed the critical illness before taking out the cover. Therefore, this may have led to these critical illness claims being rejected as underwriting may have not detected these conditions. So, measures of precaution may have been taken by including the waiting period. The waiting period may stipulate that the claimant should wait for a fixed lapse of time before the payment is awarded. It may be important to point out that some waiting periods may reach around 6 months. But this may also vary according to certain critical illness conditions such as cancer and multiple sclerosis.

In addition to, as in the UK, the success of standalone critical illness cover in South Africa also may have been minimum. There could be some reasons that may have led to the unpopularity of standalone critical illness cover. Firstly, standalone critical illness cover may have been expensive. Secondly, the toughness of certain rules regarding definitions of illnesses may have also been responsible for the lack of sales of this type of cover. Also, dilemmas in connection with legislation and tax procedures may have obliged insurers to keep the product’s high price tag. People may have then preferred accelerated covers such as life with critical illness cover or mortgage with critical illness cover. As a result there may be no more companies offering standalone critical illness policies in South Africa nowadays.

As seen, the recession in sales of critical illness cover in South Africa may be considerable. The MME may be offering more advantages than critical illness cover. But the sales of critical illness cover may not stop here. Insurers may soon come up with a design that could divert attention once again towards critical illness cover.

, , ,

Older posts >>

Find it!

Theme Design by devolux.org